Cases 41 - 50 of 72
John R Behrmann et al v. Michael Goldstein et al
as 1:2016cv01228
Plaintiff:
John R. Behrmann and Nancy P. Behrmann
Defendant:
Michael Goldstein , Christie Kennett , Husch Blackwell LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Escobar v. Gill
as 1:2016cv00952
Plaintiff:
Luis Escobar
Defendant:
Shahid Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LordMaster v. Birckhead et al
as 1:2015cv00618
Plaintiff:
Frankie Jae LordMaster
Defendant:
Ms. Birckhead, S. Hatch, W. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Gill
as 2:2014cv00542
Plaintiff:
Eric Emanuel Taylor
Defendant:
Herbert C. Gill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Craig v. Vargo et al
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Craig
Defendant:
Marie M. Vargo, Mr. Gill, Mr. Flemmings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Gill et al
as 1:2013cv00664
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority
Defendant:
Jaskaran Gill and Dulles One Flyer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bryner et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tim Bryner , Gregory Carter , Alfred P. Clark, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Roger L. Harris and County of Spotsylvania, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Underwood et al v. Gill et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Darrell Underwood and Cynthia Underwood
Defendant:
Michael R. Gill, William LeFevre and Laura Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Strong v. Sletton et al
as 1:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Strong
Defendant:
Sletton, Brown, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
