Cases 1 - 10 of 444
Chang v. Rout, et al
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
MENG UOY CHANG
Defendant:
DAVID ROUT, HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC., MURPHY CENTER LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Riley et al v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Tyler Riley, Manuel Calvillo, Ryder Timaj Cadena-Powell and others
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chang v. Rout et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Meng Uoy Chang
Defendant:
David Rout, Homeward Alliance Inc., Murphy Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nasrin Afjeh v. Village of Ottawa Hills, et al
as 24-3026
Plaintiff:
NASRIN AFJEH
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF OTTAWA HILLS, KEVIN GILMORE, in his official capacity as Mayor and President of Council and in his individual capacity, JOHN WENZLICK, in his official capacity as Chief of Police and Village Manager and in his individual capacity and others
BES Kessler Park Fund X111 LLC v. Xi et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
BES Kessler Park Fund X111 LLC doing business as Axis Kessler Park
Counter Claimant:
K'in Way Xi, George Gilmore and James Dawson
Defendant:
Glen Marion
Counter Defendant:
BES Kessler Park Fund X111 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Washington v. Gilmore et al
as 4:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Donna Washington
Defendant:
Naciska Gilmore, Latressa Avery, Charene Nowicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
