Cases 1 - 10 of 422
Damaste Productions, Inc v. TGIM Films, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03183
Plaintiff:
Damaste Productions, Inc
Defendant:
TGIM Films, Inc and Eric Gitter
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Gonzales v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Raul Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeil v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeil
Defendant:
William Gittere, Walter Romero, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Erik Silsattanak
Defendant:
The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
