Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 26-5639
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, MATTHEW ROMAN, J. WEILAND and others
Edwards v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-4395
Plaintiff:
CARL DEAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, GITTERE, ESP Warden, FORD, Nevada Attorney General and others
Montelongo v. Weiland, et al.
as 26-3975
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MONTELONGO
Defendant:
JAMES WEILAND, WILLIAM GITTERE, CURTIS RIGNEY and others
Harris v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-2265
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, W. A. GITTERE and others
Benavide v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-1923
Petitioner:
CRISTOBAL BENAVIDE
Respondent:
W. A. GITTERE, Warden of Ely State Prison, FAC 25, BRIAN WILLIAMS, FAC 25, JAMES DZURENDA, Director of Nevada Department of Corrections, FAC 25 and others
Butler v. Gittere, et al.
as 26-1551
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BUTLER
Respondent:
W. GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Williams v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-1344
Defendant:
ROMIN SMITH, STATE OF NEVADA, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. WILLIAMS
Cecile Portilla v. Charles Centinaro, et al
as 26-1207
Plaintiff:
CECILE D. PORTILLA
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF CHARLES CENTINARO, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Attorney Ethics, ATTORNEY ALEXANDRA GITTER, individually and officially and INVESTIGATOR RAJESH CHOPRA, Individually and officially
PORTILLA v. CENTINARO et al
as 3:2026cv00720
Plaintiff:
ATTORNEY CECILE DELROSE PORTILLA
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF OAE CHARLES CENTINARO, ATTORNEY ALEXANDRA GITTER, INVESTIGATOR RAJESH CHOPRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edmisten v. Indian Springs et al
as 2:2025cv02458
Plaintiff:
Justin James Edmisten
Defendant:
Indian Springs, Ricardo Saucedo, T. Weiland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
