Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Towery v. Del Toro
as 8:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Towery
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gordon et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02984
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terry Gordon and Glenn Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goins et al v. Harris Teeter, LLC
as 1:2023cv02701
Plaintiff:
Denise Goins and Glenn Goins
Defendant:
Harris Teeter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wenger v. Chesapeake Urology, et al.
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Glenn Wenger
Defendant:
MD Andrew Harbin, Chesapeake Urology and Andrew C. Harbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Wilson v. Gov. Glenn Youngkin et al
as 1:2023cv01861
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Jose Quiroz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv01748
Petitioner:
Glenn Joseph Raynor
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendoza v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
Moses Mendoza
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, Vanessa Dos Santos and Glenn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
