Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nguyen v. McKenney et al
as 1:2018cv01727
Defendant:
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Pamela H. Godwin, Timothy F. Keaney and others
Nominal Defendant:
Unum Group
Plaintiff:
Julie Nguyen
Jenkins v. McKenney et al
as 1:2018cv01651
Defendant:
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Pamela H. Godwin, Timothy F. Keaney and others
Nominal Defendant:
Unum Group
Plaintiff:
Steven Jenkins
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust v. McKenney et al
as 1:2018cv01509
Defendant:
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Pamela H. Godwin, Ronald P. O'Hanley and others
Nominal Defendant:
Unum Group
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arbuckle et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01242
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brown, Amy Dawn Beard, Jonathan Brownlee and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godwin v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00104
Petitioner:
Seanne Godwin
Respondent:
David Pierce and Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estate of James Godwin v. Smith
as 1:2011cv00330
Defendant:
Dennis L. Smith
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godwin v. Costello et al
as 1:2011cv00083
Plaintiff:
Seane Godwin
Defendant:
Costello, Scarborough, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of James Godwin v. Smith
as 1:2010cv00531
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Godwin
Defendant:
Dennis Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Durkin Contracting v. City of Newark, et al
as 1:2004cv00163
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Durkin Contracting, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Newark, Mayor Harold F. Godwin, Council Member John H. Farrell, IV and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
