Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Golda Harris v. Credit Acceptance Corp, et al
as 22-1404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GOLDA D. HARRIS, and those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP and CEO BRETT A. ROBERTS
HARRIS et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2021cv14591
Petitioner:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Plaintiff:
A.F. and M.D.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv12986
Defendant:
CEO BRETT ROBERTS, JOHN DOE and CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
HARRIS v. MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al
as 3:2018cv11139
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE , SHANNON KRAUSE , SARAH DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golda Harris v. Eric Bennett, et al
as 17-2861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. BENNETT, ZENA SUTTON, RANDALL WOOD and others
Golda Harris v. USA, et al
as 17-1660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and others
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2016cv09315
Plaintiff:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
HARRIS v. BUREAU OF PAROLE CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
GOLDA D. HARRIS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PAROLE CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
