Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Armin Azod, et al v. James Robinson, et al
as 22-56186
Petitioner:
ARMIN AZOD, an individual, RAMEZ ELGAMMAL, Dr., an individual, SHANTANU SHARMA, Dr., an individual and others
Respondent:
JAMES G. ROBINSON, an individual, MORGAN CREEK PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, GOOD STUFF, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Cecilia, LLC et al v. Azod et al
as 8:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
CECILIA, LLC, GOOD STUFF, LLC, James G. Robinson and others
Defendant:
Dr. Armin Azod, Dr. Dong Zhang, Dr. Ramez Elgammal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Armin Azod et al v. James G. Robinson et al
as 2:2022cv05214
Petitioner:
Armin Azod, Dr. Ramez Elgammal, Dr. Shantanu Sharma and others
Respondent:
James G. Robinson, Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., Cecilia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Elgammal et al v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05143
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ramez Elgammal, Dr Dong Zhang, Dr. Shantanu Sharma and others
Defendant:
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., Cecilia, LLC, Good Stuff LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Cecilia LLC et al v. Armin Azod et al
as 2:2019cv09552
Respondent:
Ramez Elgammal, dong zhang, Armin Azod and others
Petitioner:
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., James G. Robinson, Cecilia LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Really Good Stuff, LLC v. BAP Investors, L.C.
as 19-3395
Not Yet Classified:
Creative Kids Far East Inc., BAP Investors, L.C. and Really Good Stuff, LLC
Defendant:
Creative Kids, Inc.
Really Good Stuff, LLC v. BAP Investors, L.C. et al
as 1:2019cv02218
Defendant:
Creative Kids, Inc. and BAP Investors
Plaintiff:
Really Good Stuff, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
