Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Rivas v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Ada Rivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Edith Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper-Crum v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Luwanna Hooper-Crum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davies v. GEICO
as 2:2019cv01987
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company and DOES 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Claire Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 in
Brannick v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv08290
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brannick
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company and Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Gerjets et al
as 3:2019cv05912
Defendant:
B.S.U., T.A.T., B.R.S. and others
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Aberra et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv01436
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO
Plaintiff:
John Doe Aberra and Azeb Aberra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sullivan v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv01378
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Maurice Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harter v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv01330
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Mark Harter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
