Cases 21 - 30 of 39
REAVES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv01773
Plaintiff:
REGINALD REAVES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Melvin et al
as 1:2013cv01920
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Cannon
Defendant:
Debrah Melvin, Rezac and Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POTTS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2013cv05164
Plaintiff:
JIMMY POTTS
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN , RON PHILLIPS , WALTER REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAL v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PA et al
as 2:2013cv00595
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. BEAL
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graham
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2011cv05824
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GRAHAM
Defendant:
JOYCE ADAMS and JOHN DELEANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENLOW v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
IDRIS ENLOW
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, SCI-MERCER, SUPT. HARLOW, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM et al v. CARROLL
as 2:2011cv00841
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE K. GRAHAM, JOSEPH E. WATKINS and ESAU T. GRAHAM
Defendant:
DAVID M. CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Simonton, Jr. v. Franklin Tennis, et al
as 11-1934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY SIMONTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN TENNIS, BRIAN THOMPSON, ROBERT MARSH and others
SAVAGE v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
ERVIN SAVAGE
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHYSICIANT ASSISTANT HELEN, GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
