General Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Griffin v. King et al
as 4:2010cv00082
Plaintiff: Teddy Dewayne Griffin
Defendant: Ronald King , Christopher B. Epps , Connie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nunn v. Epps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00066
Plaintiff: Cruz Nunn
Defendant: Christopher Epps , Ronald King, Connie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00182
Plaintiff: Timothy Smith
Defendant: Christopher B. Epps, Ronald King, C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesus Gamez v. Janis Jack We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-40009
Petitioner - Appellant: JESUS ALBERTO GAMEZ
Respondent - Appellee: JANIS GRAHAM JACK, U. S. District Judge, The Honorable
Calhoun v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00504
Petitioner: Ashton Graham Calhoun
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamez v. Jack
as 2:2009cv00236
Petitioner: Jesus Alberto Gamez
Respondent: Janis Graham Jack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Cain
as 09-30009
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDALL GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee: BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Graham v. Parker
as 08-60871
Petitioner - Appellant: DENNIS GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee: JERRY PARKER, State of Mississippi
Graham v. Quarterman
as 6:2008cv00217
Petitioner: Erick Graham
Respondent: Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. Chandler et al
as 1:2008cv00057
Petitioner: Adrian Graham
Respondent: Rodney W Chandler and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?