Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Casanova v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Federal Government, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howard v. Jaffa et al
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Howard, Jr.
Defendant:
Ben Jaffa, Jr., Graham Investment Company and Jay Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haggins v. Mullen et al
as 3:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
Mary Haggins
Defendant:
Graham Mullen, Tim Underwood, Kelvin Parsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Town of Mint Hill et al
as 3:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Michael Pomarico, Scott Hall, Wayne McChesney and others
Plaintiff:
Zinnia Lambert and Dion Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephans v. Jackson County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2019cv00180
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Stephans
Defendant:
Brian Welmon, Jackson County Courthouse, James Clawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Bignall et al
as 3:2014cv00392
Defendant:
Daniel Bignall , Brandon Williamson , Rodney Monroe and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Quinton Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
