Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Fleischer v. Hoskins et al
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fleischer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hoskins, Correctional Nurse Raymond Graham and John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pugh v. Coleman et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ethan Pugh
Defendant:
Michael Sean Coleman, April Riley, Steven Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fleischer v. Haskins et al
as 5:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fleischer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Haskins, Correctional Nurse Raymond Graham and John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Graham Packaging Company, L.P.
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
John Scott
Defendant:
Graham Packaging Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Paugh v. Graham
as 5:2022cv00195
In Re:
Lester O. Paugh, Jr.
Defendant:
Ruth E. Graham
Graham v. Peters et al
as 5:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Tracy Graham
Defendant:
Paula Peters and Russell Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Antero Resources Corporation
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Luscious Graham
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Antero Resources Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Luscious Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Warden et al
as 5:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden, Delmos Graham, Stephen Balducci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Brooke County Parks and Recreation Commission
as 5:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tina Graham
Defendant:
Brooke County Parks and Recreation Commission
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00032
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
