Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Clark v. Mehr et al
as 1:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
Gregory Clark
Defendant:
John Mehr, Scott Conger and Madison County Government Official
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of New York et al
as 6:2017cv06344
Plaintiff:
Wendell Smith
Defendant:
State of New York, Kristine Merrick, John Doe Police Officer #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00454
Petitioner:
Charles Gregory Clark
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Death Penalty)
Willis v. Rochester Police Department et al
as 6:2015cv06284
Plaintiff:
Otis B. Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
Rochester Police Department, City of Rochester - Mayor Lovely Warren, Sandra Doorley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. McAvoy
as 13-4875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Lloyd
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael McAvoy, Police Officer, Thomas Sabbio, Sergeant, Gregory Clarke and others
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv06849
Defendant:
Gregory Clarke, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, P.O. Michael McAvoy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv06542
Defendant:
P.O. Gregory Clarke, Commissioner Raymond Kelly, Michael McAvoy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv08202
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Defendant:
Michael McAvoy, Thomas Sabbio, Gregory Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv06210
Defendant:
P.O. Gregory Clarke, Raymond Kelly, Michael McAvoy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd v. McAvoy et al
as 1:2013cv07257
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Defendant:
Michael McAvoy, Pollari, Gregory Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
