Cases 1 - 10 of 46
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOUNTAIN et al v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2020cv00405
Defendant:
CURTIS CARTER, JOSEPH L POLITE, CAPTAIN MARK AGBAOSI and others
Petitioner:
BRENDA MOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUNTAIN v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2020cv00406
Defendant:
CURTIS CARTER, CAPTAIN MARK AGBAOSI, CAPTAIN THOMAS F SUMPTER and others
Plaintiff:
BRENDA MOUNTAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00113
Defendant:
LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00089
Defendant:
CLYDE ALLEN, LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCAS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2020cv00097
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HUGH LUCAS
Defendant:
NURSE HALL, NURSE PRACTIONER LINDSEY, GEORGIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2019cv00373
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER, CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN and others
Petitioner:
JOE W PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
