Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21935
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Able et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv01287
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Able, Gilbert Ackerson, Destiny Alger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Able et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Luke Able, Gilbert Ackerson, Destiny Alger and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Pappas v. Timothy Cannon, et al
as 17-11539
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY PAPPAS
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY H. CANNON and ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Barberi v. Pappas et al
as 1:2015cv20068
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Gregory Pappas, Gregory Pappas, Sr. and Christina Pappas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
PAPPAS v. CREWS
as 3:2014cv00564
Petitioner:
GREGORY PAPPAS
Respondent:
MICHAEL D CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schein v. Pappas et al
as 1:2014cv05019
Defendant:
Gregory Charles Pappas, Gregory Pappas, Jr and O&R Medical Sales and Service, LLC
Plaintiff:
Henry Schein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roof & Rack Products, Inc. v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2014cv80506
Plaintiff:
Roof & Rack Products, Inc.
Defendant:
John Sullivan and Gregory Pappas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Karakis v. ETM, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv21096
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Karakis
Defendant:
ETM, Inc. and Virginia W & Gregory Pappas TRS James Pappas Tr & Etals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
