Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00542
Plaintiff:
IN TOUCH CONCEPTS, INC.
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. , CELLCO PARTNERSHIP , VODAFONE GROUP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 12-383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
In Touch Concepts, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA ZCOM
Defendant - Appellee:
Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership, DBA Verizon Wireless, Vodafone Group Plc and others
In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
In Touch Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc. , Cellco Partnership , Vodafone Group Plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker Digital LLC v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
Walker Digital LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc. , Apple Inc., Barnes & Noble Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ratermann et al v. Cellco Partnership et al
as 4:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
Carl J Ratermann and Vicki L. Ratermann
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC, Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MLMC LTD V AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
as 02-1611
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
360 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
MLMC, LTD.
WorldCom Inc, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1002
Petitioner:
WorldCom Inc.
Terminated Party:
MCI WorldCom, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
AT&T Corporation, GTE Service Corporation, GTE Alaska Incorporated and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
SBC Communications Inc.
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Competitive Telecommunications Association, United States Telecom Association and Association of Communications Enterprises
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
