Cases 41 - 50 of 121
WOODARD v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv00741
Respondent:
MR. MILLIS and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY
Petitioner:
JAMES E. WOODARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STARNES-BEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv00698
Plaintiff:
DAMION DONTE STARNES-BEY
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDSEY v. VAUGHAN et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, GUILFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CAROLYN VAUGHAN and others
Plaintiff:
VINSON PERNELL LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION STAFF
as 1:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
JOEVONNIE BALDWIN, JR.
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERIS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 1:2020cv00217
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2020cv00177
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERIS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 1:2020cv00146
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. ROGERS
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY, CHIEF WAYNE SCOTT, EMERALD M. CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BRANNON et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
OFFICER K. B. STEWART, MAGISTRATE H. D. BRANNON, RANDOLPH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
QUANTEZ THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
