Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Camacho, et al v. Claverol-Siaca
as 22-1729
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE RUBEN CAMACHO, VIVIANA CONNER and MARI ANGELA CAMACHO
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ESTRELLA CLAVEROL-SIACA
Defendant:
HECTOR RIVERA-SIACA
3Rd Party Defendant:
ESTATE OF LUZ SELENIA SIACA-GUZMAN, LUZ SELENIA RIVERA-SIACA, LUIS RIVERA-SIACA and others
Guzman-Matias et al v. Suiza Dairy Corp. et al
as 3:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Suiza Dairy Corp. and Vaqueria Tres Monjitas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Guzman-Matias and Rafael Juarbe-De Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Abreu-Morales et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv02067
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Abreu-Morales, Jose M. Arroyo-Morales, Alex Omar-Bernardi and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , Doral Financial Corporation, Doral Mortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States Fidelity v. Cobian-Gonzalez, et al
as 13-1537
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO.,
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL COBIAN-GUZMAN and TATIANA COBIAN-GONZALEZ
Interested Party:
GUILLERMO A. NIGAGLIONI-BERRIOS
Guzman v. O'Neill et al
as 4:2011cv40144
Plaintiff:
Francisco Guzman
Defendant:
Gary P O'Neill and City of Fitchburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Cobian-Guzman et al
as 3:2011cv01415
Plaintiff:
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Jose Manuel Cobian-Guzman and Tatiana Cobian-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Maldonado Lopez et al
as 3:2011cv01179
Plaintiff:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Defendant:
Miguel A Maldonado Lopez and Rosario I Guzman Nieto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barca v. Fontaine, et al.
as 4:2009cv40022
Plaintiff:
Anthony Barca
Defendant:
David Michael Fontaine and Margaret Guzman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
