Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. HORTH et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARIES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minniefield v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Nathan Minniefield
Defendant:
Galipeau, Watts, Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kente Barker v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
as 22-2572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES MILLER and others
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. NCF et al
as 1:2021cv01794
Defendant:
FREDERICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00147
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant:
FREDRICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2020cv00563
Defendant:
DOUG HUYVAERT, DREW ADAMS, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA E. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00581
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH and GWENDOLYN M. HORTH
Petitioner:
DONYALL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
