Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Alan Kreilein v. Gwendolyn Horth, et al
as 20-1994
Defendant / Appellee:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, Chair, Indiana Parole Board and ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner, Indiana Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN KREILEIN
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00147
Plaintiff:
DONYALL E. WHITE-BEY
Defendant:
FREDRICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2020cv00563
Defendant:
DOUG HUYVAERT, DREW ADAMS, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA E. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donyall White v. Brian Smith, et al
as 19-3433
Petitioner:
DONYALL WHITE
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, Chair of Parole Board and BRIAN SMITH, Superintendent
WHITE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00581
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH and GWENDOLYN M. HORTH
Petitioner:
DONYALL WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donyall White v. Brian Smith, et al
as 19-3307
Petitioner:
DONYALL WHITE
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, Chair of Parole Board and BRIAN SMITH, Superintendent
YOUNG v. CARTER et al
as 1:2018cv02079
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., FREDERICK A. MEDLEY, ROBERT SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK A. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLEMAN v. HORTH
as 2:2017cv00512
Defendant:
JANE DOE #1, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, VIRGIL R. MADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COCHRAN et al v. COOK-CRAWFORD et al
as 3:2016cv00182
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY LYN COCHRAN
Defendant:
BARBARA COOK-CRAWFORD, KASEY HAMMELL, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv01173
Defendant:
PAULA DICKSON, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
