Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. HORTH et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARIES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minniefield v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Nathan Minniefield
Defendant:
Galipeau, Watts, Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kente Barker v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
as 22-2572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES MILLER and others
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Klock v. Indiana Parole Board, et al
as 21-2970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT KLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH and CRAIG SMITH
SMITH v. NCF et al
as 1:2021cv01794
Defendant:
FREDERICK A. MEDLEY, JAMES W. SHAFFER, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLOCK v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
VINCENT KLOCK
Defendant:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and CRAIG SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan Kreilein v. Gwendolyn Horth, et al
as 20-2120
Defendant / Appellee:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, Chair, Indiana Parole Board and ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner, Indiana Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN KREILEIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
