Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Brewster v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District et al
as 3:2022cv08956
Plaintiff:
Cody Brewster
Defendant:
Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District and Rodney Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Gaddy v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Gaddy
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, S. Swain and V. Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddis v. Moseley et al
as 4:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Darryl Gaddis
Defendant:
Howard E. Moseley, Ramirez and Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Gaddy v. Superior Court of California et al
as 1:2021cv01270
Respondent:
H.A. Staley, Superior Court of California, County of Kern (Delano-McFarland) and others
Petitioner:
Michael Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks et al v. Stockton Unified School District et al
as 2:2021at00479
Plaintiff:
Elinor E Banks, Keenan G Mancho, Artia S Taylor and others
Defendant:
Sonny Larkins, Stephanie Reeves, Brian Biederman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks et al v. Stockton Unified School District et al
as 2:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Keenan Mancho, Kyndal Mancho, Elinor Banks and others
Defendant:
Sonny Larkins, Stephanie Reeves, Brian Biederman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
English v. Granite Construction Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv03116
Defendant:
Molly Campbell, David C Darnell, Jeffrey J Lyash and others
Plaintiff:
Beau English
(PC) Zaiza v. Peacock et al
as 1:2019cv01475
Defendant:
A. Lucas, C. Gonzalez, Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Roberto Zaiza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Express Mobile, Inc. v. Gaddis Partners, Ltd.
as 3:2018cv05058
Plaintiff:
Express Mobile, Inc.
Defendant:
Gaddis Partners, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
