Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Carter v. The City of New York
as 1:2023cv06785
Plaintiff:
Irene Carter
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, Andre C. Gaddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gaddis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01018
Plaintiff:
Keona Danielle Gaddis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gaddis et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2022cv08810
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gaddis and T. G.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Interested Party:
Amy M Gernon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1666
Gaddy et. al. v. Tri-State Area Moving Corp. et. al.
as 2:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Lyle Gaddy, Kierre Wiggins, Kendale Getaw and others
Defendant:
COACH FURNITURE SERVICES INC., TRI-STATE AREA MOVING CORP., HEDVA BAKAL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Weathersbee v. Meenavalli et al
as 1:2018cv10182
Defendant:
Yogesh Patel, Venkat S. Meenavalli, John Parker and others
Nominal Defendant:
Longfin Corp.
Plaintiff:
Michael Weathersbee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss
Singhoffer v. Meenavalli et al
as 1:2018cv07859
Defendant:
Yogesh Patel, Venkat S. Meenavalli, John Parker and others
Nominal Defendant:
Longfin Corp.
Plaintiff:
Mark Singhoffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddy v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv08960
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Joseph Ponte, Martin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
Renee Gaddis
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gaddy v. The People of the State of New York
as 9:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Robert Gaddy
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
