Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Murdock et al v. Gaddy et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Cleo Murdock and Russell Elswick
Defendant:
John Rutherford, Kanawha County Sheriff Office, Christopher David Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigen et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03742
Plaintiff:
Sue Vigen , Tina Fitzpatrick , Janet Garrett and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv03072
Plaintiff:
Peggy J. Gaddis and Eulice Clifton Gaddis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08797
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Gaddis and Carlton L. Gaddis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddy v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv01710
Plaintiff:
Dina Gaddy
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Kay Gaddis and Robert Frank Gaddis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29599
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gaddis and Robert Gaddis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddy v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv25438
Plaintiff:
Darlene Gaddy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheeles-Gaddy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17971
Plaintiff:
Shannon Wheeles-Gaddy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05755
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Gaddis and Bobby G. Gaddis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
