Cases 31 - 40 of 67
JOHNSON v. GAINEY
as 2:2010cv05685
Plaintiff:
STANLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CLYDE D. GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv02752
Plaintiff:
WALLACE JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CLYDE GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHODIYA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv02711
Plaintiff:
OLUSOLA SHODIYA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2010cv02168
Plaintiff:
WALLACE JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CLYDE GAINEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STALKER v. ADLER et al
as 2:2010cv02112
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STALKER
Defendant:
DAVID ADLER , MAHER , THE CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MARSHALL et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv02083
Plaintiff:
TERRELLE MARSHALL and NATASJA MARSHALL
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PATRICK RAMSEY, VINCENT PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv01323
Plaintiff:
JERRY K. LAWSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENIGWE v. GAINEY et al
as 2:2010cv00684
Plaintiff:
CHINEDU ENIGWE
Defendant:
CLYDE GAINEY and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HADDEN et al v. SUPER SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00517
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. HADDEN, JR. and KATHLEEN R. HADDEN
Defendant:
SUPER SERVICE, INC., GAINEY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., GAINEY CORPORATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HYMAN v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
FRANK HYMAN
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, CLYDE GAINEY, GERALD MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
