Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Robert Gaither v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01074
Plaintiff:
Robert Gaither
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Dixon v. Partida et al
as 4:2022cv04461
Plaintiff:
Bruce M Dixon
Defendant:
Ms. Partida, L. Gamboa, I Mondragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Acts Syrene Apartments
as 3:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Gaither S. Harris
Defendant:
Acts Syrene Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Victoria Showe-Gaither v. The Credit Pros International Corporation, et al
as 2:2019cv07227
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and The Credit Pros International Corporation
Plaintiff:
Victoria Showe-Gaither
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
The Booth Family Trust v. Huang et al
as 4:2019cv00876
Defendant:
Mark A. Stevens, Robert K. Burgess, NVIDIA Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The Booth Family Trust
Yang v. Huang et al
as 4:2019cv00766
Defendant:
Mark A. Stevens, Robert K. Burgess, Colette M. Kress and others
Plaintiff:
Yuju Yang
In re NVIDIA Corporation Consolidated Derivative Litigation
as 4:2019cv00341
Plaintiff:
Sanghyep Han
Defendant:
Mark A. Stevens, Colette M. Kress, Robert K. Burgess and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
The Booth Family Trust and Yuju Yang
Gaither v. Madden et al
as 3:2018cv02817
Respondent:
Xavier Becerra and Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Maurice Gaither
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alford et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2018cv05046
Plaintiff:
Davennia Pope, Derel Smith, Rodney D. Cullors and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
