Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Garces v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-3166
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL GARCES
Defendant:
M. GAMBOA, KERN KLARK, D. HERNANDEZ and others
Garces v. Matheny et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Defendant:
Suite St. John, Richard Matheny, Suite St. John at Gallows Point and others
Plaintiff:
Rolando Garces
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Caicedo-Garces
as 24-20066
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Enrique Caicedo-Garces, also known as Ricky's Father
Garces-Rojo et al v. Longbridge Financial, LLC
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Garces-Rojo, Linda Joyce Bannister-Garces and Linda Joyce Bannister Garces
Defendant:
Longbridge Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
v. INTERNATIONAL CLEANERS, CORP. et al
as 0:2023cv62428
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL CLEANERS, CORP., JOB INVESTORS LLC, GQ NCF-CLERMONT CLEANERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
International Cleaners, Corp v. Job Investors LLC et al
as 0:2023cv62430
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL CLEANERS, CORP. and International Cleaners, Corp
Defendant:
JOB INVESTORS LLC, GQ NCF-CLERMONT CLEANERS, INC., Prusso Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Palaquibay-Luna v. Garland
as 23-8086
Petitioner:
GERALDINE YAJAIRA PALAQUIBAY-LUNA, KADEE JAILYN GARCES-PALAQUIBAY and SHANAIA ESPERANZA GARCES-PALAQUIBAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Armstrong Laboratorios de Mexico S.A. de C.V. v. Opmx, LLC, et al.
as 23-3800
Petitioner:
ARMSTRONG LABORATORIOS DE MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.
Respondent:
OPMX, LLC, FERNANDO EDUARDO BEDOY GARCES, ALIXINGA INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
