Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Gardiner v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv21204
Plaintiff:
Elon Gardiner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Fgardish
as 3:2014cv02477
Plaintiff:
Jessie W. Jones
Defendant:
Gardiner Fgardish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sterling Stampley v. Gardiner et al
as 3:2014cv01352
Plaintiff:
Kyle-Ivan Sterling Stampley
Defendant:
Francis Gardiner, Jarrod Buswell, Benaventa Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardiner v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00094
Petitioner:
Warren Lee Gardiner
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mallett v. Garner et al
as 1:2013cv02899
Plaintiff:
Dawane Arthur Mallett
Defendant:
Garner, T. Gardiner, Joseph Wadas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Smith v. Montgomery Cnty Sheriff's Off, et al
as 13-3986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY M. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DETECTIVE PAUL HENSON, DETECTIVE STEVEN D. GARDINER and others
Warren Gardiner v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-20415
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARREN LEE GARDINER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gardiner v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv01515
Petitioner:
Warren Lee Gardiner
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stine v. Kuta et al
as 1:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
S.M. Kuta, P. Klein, Giaconi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Larry Gibbs, Jr. v. Angela Corey, et al
as 13-11583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY ALONZO GIBBS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA B. COREY, State Attorney Florida, JOHN GARDINER KALINOWSKI, Assistant State Attorney Florida, ROBERT M. FOSTER, Judge Nassau County Florida and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
