Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Garner v. PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., Dr. Alfred Baldera, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brendon Tyre Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Saad
as 2:2018cv00053
Petitioner:
David Garner
Respondent:
Jennifer Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-016.000-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-016.000-ROW, Jerry E. Hyatt, Michael Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Garner v. Entzel
as 3:2018cv00051
Petitioner:
John Garner
Respondent:
Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garner v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Marie A Garner
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Counter_claimant:
Prakash Ranka
Counter_defendant:
Marie A Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elking et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03746
Plaintiff:
Valerie Elking , Kimberly Winburn , Amada Wright and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vigen et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03742
Plaintiff:
Sue Vigen , Tina Fitzpatrick , Janet Garrett and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02919
Plaintiff:
Carla Garner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01483
Plaintiff:
Linda Garner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garner v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
Barbara Garner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
