Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Baker v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Chudney Baker
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Bronelle, Laune Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01436
Plaintiff:
Chudney Baker
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Bronelle, Laune Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
Kharen Davis, Ohireime Osemobor, Juston Martin and others
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Stephen Brunell, Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garrett v. ITM TwentyFirst, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jerry Garrett
Defendant:
ITM TwentyFirst, LLC, John Does and ABC Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
2001, Inc. et al v. S.C. Garrett Co., LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01996
Plaintiff:
2001, Inc. and Thomas L. Kelly
Defendant:
S.C. Garrett Co., LLC, Environmental Roofing Components, LLC., Stan Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jumpp v. Hartford et al
as 3:2016cv00656
Plaintiff:
Junior Jumpp
Defendant:
City of Hartford , Anthony Pia, Greg Corvino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
2001, Inc. et al v. S.C. Garrett Co., LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
2001, Inc. and Thomas L. Kelly
Defendant:
S.C. Garrett Co., LLC, Environmental Roofing Components, LLC., Stan Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Garrett v. Crown Equipment Corp
as 3:2015cv00942
Defendant:
Crown Equipment Corp
Plaintiff:
Dorsey Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
