Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 141 - 150 of 250
Ridley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00377
Plaintiff: Edward Ridley
Defendant: Gary Hetzel, Luther Strange, The Attorney General of the State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Hetzell et al
as 2:2011cv01595
Petitioner: Cordaryl Freeman
Respondent: Gary Hetzell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chastine v. Hetzell et al
as 2:2011cv01549
Plaintiff: Paul Chastine
Defendant: Gary Hetzell, Christopher Gordy, L. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landrum v. Hetzel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00227
Petitioner: Michael Landrum
Respondent: Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glover v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2011cv01243
Petitioner: Terry C Glover
Respondent: Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Avila v. Hetzel
as 1:2011cv00160
Petitioner: Mario Avila
Respondent: Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guss v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00236
Plaintiff: Marshall Allen Guss
Defendant: Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Hetzel et al
as 7:2011cv01032
Petitioner: Timothy Wayne Thomas
Respondent: Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guss v. Hetzel et al
as 4:2011cv00937
Petitioner: Marshall Allen Guss
Respondent: Gary Hetzel and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Avila v. Hetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00123
Petitioner: Mario Avila
Respondent: Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?