Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Pesante v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01070
Plaintiff:
Jose Pesante
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Licari v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00976
Plaintiff:
Randal Licari
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00955
Plaintiff:
Luis Claudio
Defendant:
Lieutenant Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babulsky v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00865
Plaintiff:
James Babulsky
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TeekaSingh v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
Osbert TeekaSingh
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulcher v. Crew et al
as 1:2016cv02437
Defendant:
Donovan Allen, Brian Clarke, Rudolph F. Crew and others
Plaintiff:
William Fulcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ziemba v. Semple et al
as 3:2015cv01750
Plaintiff:
Duane Ziemba
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv01035
Plaintiff:
Selina Miller
Defendant:
Gary Johnson, Michael Joseph Angelo and Dale Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, Local No. 3 et al v. Alpha Masonry Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00267
Plaintiff:
International Union Of Bricklayers And Allied Craftworkers, Local No. 3 , Eugene Caccamise , Frank Pietrowski and others
Defendant:
Alpha Masonry Construction Co., Inc. and Mark Pepe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Stanga et al v. City of New York
as 1:2012cv06254
Plaintiff:
Paul Stanga , Christopher Jones , John Andersen and others
Defendant:
City of New York and Anthony Linzy
Petitioner:
Mark Crowley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
