Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SMITH v. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00896
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HUNTINGDON
Petitioner:
GARY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Iorio v. Weipa et al
as 3:2018cv00207
Defendant:
Joshua Weipa and Gary Smith
Plaintiff:
Vincent Iorio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY et al v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY, JAYENECA BAILEY, DENISE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, DANIEL GEHLMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Smith v. John Wagner, et al
as 14-1169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE JOHN F. WAGNER, JOSEPH M. GEORGE and DAVID W. KAISER, Esq. Assistant Public Defender
Gary Smith v. John Wagner, et al
as 13-4690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE JOHN F. WAGNER, JOSEPH M. GEORGE and DAVID W. KAISER, Esq. Assistant Public Defender
SMITH v. WAGNER et al
as 2:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
GARY SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN F. WAGNER, JR., JOSEPH M. GEORGE, JR. and DAVID W. KAISER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY et al v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY, JAYENECA BAILEY, DENISE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, DANIEL GEHLMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan Davis v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 11-4001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN BLAIR DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, TAMMY CRAMMER, BOBBI A. MCCALLISTER and others
THOMAS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, ALLEN JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Davis v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 11-1253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN BLAIR DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, TAMMY CRAMMER, BOBBI A. MCCALLISTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
