Cases 1 - 10 of 406
Garza v. Thornell
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Juan Garza
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tamir Abdullah v. State of California et al.
as 5:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Tamir Abdullah
Defendant:
State of California, Michael Ramos, Eddy Lange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Garza v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv01723
Petitioner:
Angel M. Garza
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Bryan Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Garza
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Warden, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Earl Kenebrew Jr. v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv06047
Plaintiff:
Ronald Earl Kenebrew, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Sgt. Flores and Sgt. Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08493
Plaintiff:
Raymon Garza
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Thomas Samuel Wallace
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Leuck, Unknown Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garza v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Garza
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, D. Southworth, Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
