Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv00643
Plaintiff:
LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , CAPE CORAL HOSPITAL , GULF COAST MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Bennett et al v. Pratt Regional Medical Center Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00380
Plaintiff:
Bradley W Bennett and Donna Bennett
Defendant:
Pratt Regional Medical Center Corporation, Banner Health, Banner Gateway Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Prickette et al v. Lind et al
as 3:2012cv01267
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Prickette and Amy Prickette
Defendant:
Roger C. Lind , Gateway Health System, Inc. , Gateway Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Didley v. The Bone and Joint Group, et al
as 08-6170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY PAUL DIDLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BONE AND JOINT GROUP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Didley v. Shoopman et al
as 3:2008cv00773
Petitioner:
Anthony Paul Didley
Respondent:
(f/n/u) Shoopman, Bone and Joint Group, The, Montgomery County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Didley v. Shoopman et al
as 3:2008mc00158
Plaintiff:
Anthony Paul Didley
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Shoopman, Bone and Joint Group, The, Montgomery County Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
