Cases 11 - 20 of 309
(PC) Fenix v. Newsom et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Davon Fenix
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Waddle and North Kern State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawes v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
William Orren Dawes
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, Rob Bonta, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Melger v. Newsome
as 2:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Thomas Joseph Melger
Respondent:
Gavin Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Fenix v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Davon Fenix
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Waddle and North Kern State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Newsom
as 5:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bennett v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Hambun, Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Khademi v. Newsome et al
as 2:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
Davood Khademi
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, City Council and Immigration Naturalization, Services (INS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Foster v. Newsome
as 2:2023cv02896
Plaintiff:
Martin Lee Foster
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Hill v. Governor Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv09670
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, State of California, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sykes v. Newsom et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Troy Sykes
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Scott Macomber and Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
