Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Gilder et al v. Charlie Daniels Racing, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Rufus Gilder and Sonia Gilder
Defendant: Charlie Daniels Racing, LLC, Brian W. Lown, Esquire, Charisse M. Mullen, Esquire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gayles v. Booth et al
as 3:2023cv00767
Plaintiff: Dustin Jermaine Gayles
Defendant: Captain Booth, Captain Lucy and Pete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayle v. USA
as 3:2023cv00393
Petitioner: Lamar Gayle
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gayle v. USA
as 3:2023cv00168
Petitioner: O'Neil Gayle
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Nunnally v. Woodson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00543
Plaintiff: Kasheem Nunnally
Defendant: D. Woodson, Lieutenant Carbitt, Lieutenant Rorier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gayle v. USA
as 3:2022cv00522
Petitioner: Lamar Gayle
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Alexander et al
as 2:2022cv00207
Plaintiff: Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Melissa D. Alexander, Jare Peoples, Zion Malcolm Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Gayle v. USA
as 3:2022cv00343
Petitioner: Lamar Gayle
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gayle v. USA
as 3:2022cv00344
Petitioner: Lamar Gayle
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?