Cases 81 - 90 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00254
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-12749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States v. Rahmad Gedde
as 16-3898
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Rahmad Lashad Geddes
Education Networks of America, Inc. v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Education Networks of America, Inc.
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Department of Administration, J. Michael Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv23582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Department of Administration, Robert L Geddes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould et al v. First Student Management, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00359
Plaintiff:
Luz Maria Alicea, Paula Allison, Penelope Belanger and others
Defendant:
First Student Management, LLC and First Student, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Oyos v. NYLA Cafe, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv04567
Plaintiff:
Segundo Oyos
Defendant:
NYLA Cafe, LLC, NYC JB's LLC, MPDRAW LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Price v. Mike & Tristan Geddes Dairy, LLC. et al
as 4:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ed Price
Defendant:
Mike & Tristan Geddes Dairy, LLC., Mike Geddes and Tristan Geddes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Rahmad Gedde
as 15-3731
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Rahmad Lashad Geddes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
