Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Bailey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Brevard County)
as 6:2020cv02170
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Ronald Gene Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67343
Plaintiff:
RANDY GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2018cv00706
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, C.C. BLAKE, JOSEPH GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, JEFFREY BAREFOOT, R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, LICENSE AND THEFT DIVISION, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, CHRISTOPHER C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, RON SMITH and others
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., C. C. BLAKE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
