Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Smith v. FA CO WR Chevrolet, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03437
Plaintiff:
Kayla Smith
Defendant:
FA CO WR Chevrolet, LLC doing business as Foundation Chevrolet and Medved Chevrolet and General Motors Financial Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701 - Odometer Requirements Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv40103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Randolph v. General Motors Financial Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02061
Counter Defendant:
Jalen Randolph
Defendant:
General Motors Financial Company, Inc. and Feldmax LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. General Motors Financial Company
as 4:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Kyle Williams
Defendant:
General Motors Financial Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
