Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ballentine v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv05939
Plaintiff:
Marvelle J. Ballentine and Jay
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Accenture LLP, Taskus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Marvelle Ballentine
as 26-11229
Petitioner:
In re: MARVELLE J. BALLENTINE
Respondent:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ACCENTURE LLP, TASKUS, INC. and others
Marvelle BallentineIn re: Marvelle Ballentine
as 26-11226
Petitioner:
In re: MARVELLE J. BALLENTINE
Respondent:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ACCENTURE LLP, TASKUS, INC. and others
Ballentine v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv00213
Plaintiff:
Marvelle J. Ballentine
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Accenture LLP, TaskUs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Ballentine v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 6:2026cv00376
Plaintiff:
Marvelle J. Ballentine and Jay
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Accenture LLP, Taskus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LeJeune v. Rightpoint Consulting, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01776
Defendant:
Rightpoint Consulting, LLC and Genpact Limited
Plaintiff:
Victor LeJeune
Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc.
as 20-3657
Defendant / Appellee:
Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Headstrong, Inc. and Genpact Limited
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arvind Gupta
Arvind Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc., et al
as 19-2828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARVIND GUPTA
Defendant / Appellee:
HEADSTRONG, INC., GENPACT LIMITED and PATRICK PIZZELLA, Acting Secretary of Labor
Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc.
as 19-3044
Defendant / Appellee:
Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Headstrong, Inc. and Genpact Limited
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arvind Gupta
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.