Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Chiggers Bar, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Chiggers Bar, LLC, Randall Dollar, Gandy Shane Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Gentry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gentry
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hooks v. Blocker et al
as 6:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Blocker, Joe Norwood, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Core Civic Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Darren Lee Price and Darren Lee Price, Jr.
Defendant:
Core Civic Corrections and Mark Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentry v. Housing Authority for the City of Del City, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gentry
Defendant:
Housing Authority for the City of Del City, Oklahoma and Lucinda Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Donahue v. Gentry
as 5:2021cv00183
Petitioner:
Robert Lyon Donahue, Jr
Respondent:
Mark Gentry
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1153
Crick v. Gentry
as 5:2021cv00103
Petitioner:
Carl Douglas Crick, Jr
Respondent:
Mark Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brock v. Crow
as 5:2021cv00036
Respondent:
Director DOC Scott Crow and Mark Gentry
Petitioner:
Aaron Thomas Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brock v. Crow
as 6:2020cv00460
Respondent:
Mark Gentry and Scott Crow
Petitioner:
Aaron Thomas Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
