Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gentry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05084
Plaintiff:
George D Gentry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Ely et al
as 2:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant:
Moryssa N Ely and Joseph Gentri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Gentry v. Justice et al
as 3:2021cv05521
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bernard Gentry
Defendant:
Heather Justice, Faaitu T Vaitia, Courtney McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lippert v. Caballos-Galendo et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Idaho State Corrections Center, Sergeant Host and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Lippert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Hills et al v. Gentry et al
as 3:2019cv05634
Defendant:
City of Forks and Michael J Gentry
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hills and Ryan Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2019cv01064
Defendant:
City of Forks, Michael J. Gentry and Michael J Gentry
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hills, Estate of Edward Lowell Hills and Joshua Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luyster v. Bishop et al
as 3:2018cv06022
Defendant:
Daniel Schaub, Daniel Plotner, Scott Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Luyster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
