Cases 31 - 40 of 383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Curtis Hunter v. Lieutenant Morris, et al
as 22-11599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MORRIS, In his/her individual and official capacity, TAMMY BAILEY and THE GEO GROUP INC
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Manetirony Clervrain v. USA, et al
as 22-11212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
VAN BUREN et al v. ABRAXAS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
TOBIAS VAN BUREN, JAYDEN ROBINSON, CAMERON JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ABRAXAS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, CORNELL ABRAXAS GROUP, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
JABREE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP, INC. and D.O. RONALD B. PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
