Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
George Dempsey v. Ann Elmore, et al
as 10-11877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE A. DEMPSEY, a.k.a. Anthony M. Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN ELMORE, Assistant District Attorney, JAVIER PORTALES, Garden City Police Department, BEN SELPH, Garden City Police Department and others
Dempsey et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
George Gerard Dempsey and Susan Dempsey
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hollander et al v. KA and KM Development, Inc.
as 6:2008cv02132
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elson, Sheela Indran, William Henry Hiscocks and others
Defendant:
KA and KM Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
George M. Dempsey v. Owens-illinois, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-78146
Plaintiff:
George M. Dempsey
Defendant:
Owens-illinois, Inc
Dempsey v. St. Lawrence
as 4:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
George A. Dempsey
Defendant:
Al St. Lawrence
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEMPSEY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv78146
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. DEMPSEY
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dempsey v. Elmore et al
as 4:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
George A. Dempsey
Defendant:
Ann Elmore, Tom Edenfield, Javier Portales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dempsey v. Lawton et al
as 4:2007cv00091
Plaintiff:
George A. Dempsey
Defendant:
Spencer Lawton, Jr., Ann Elmore, Garden City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dempsey v. Lawton et al
as 4:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
George A. Dempsey
Defendant:
Spencer Lawton and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
