Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Donald Sherrill et al v. George Edward Boston et al
as 8:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Donald Sherrill, Anthony DiPiero and Hunt and Henriques
Defendant:
George Edward Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dades, Jr. v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv06289
Plaintiff:
George Edward Dades, Jr.
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George Edward Hicks v. Ruffo Espinosa Jr. et al
as 2:2017cv09127
Defendant:
Ruffo Espinosa, Jr., Ruffo Espinosa, Jr., James Goldstein and others
Plaintiff:
George Edward Hicks
Ferguson v. Mindoro, MD et al
as 3:2016cv06417
Plaintiff:
George Edward Ferguson
Defendant:
Michael Mindoro, MD and Roselle Branch, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J and J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Chris Scott et al
as 5:2016cv00776
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Chris Scott and George Edward Scott
Barich v. City of Cotati et al
as 3:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
George Edward Barich
Defendant:
City of Cotati and Michael Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Copa Room LLC et al
as 2:2013cv04491
Plaintiff:
Amazement Music, Broadcast Music Inc, EMI Blackwood Music Inc and others
Defendant:
Christopher David Breed, Scott Tungfang Chen, Copa Room LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Summers v. Chapnick et.al.
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
George Edward Summers
Defendant:
R. Chapnick, M Boparai, J. Biol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
