Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Nam Ba Nguyen v. Orange County District Attorney et al
as 8:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Nam Ba and Nam Ba Nguyen
Defendant:
Orange County District Attorney and George Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00166
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Chandler et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 4:2011cv03841
Plaintiff:
Kai Chandler , George Turner , Craig Cooley and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chandler et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2011cv03841
Plaintiff:
Kai Chandler , George Turner , Craig Cooley and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company , Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Loretta Johnson, et al v. City of Unalakleet, et al
as 11-35054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORETTA A. JOHNSON, individually, LORETTA A. JOHNSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dane Johnson deceased and BRIAN A. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF UNALAKLEET and GEORGE TURNER
Johnson et al v. City of Unalakleet et al
as 3:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Loretta A. Johnson, Loretta A. Johnson and Brian A. Johnson
Defendant:
City of Unalakleet and George Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
USA v. State of California, et al
as 08-15400
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and WILLIAM LOCKYER, in his capacity as Attorney General for State of CA
Movant - Appellant:
GEORGE TURNER, George Turner, Proposed Intervenor, JUAN MORALES, Juan Morales, proposed Intervenor and ERIC THIELE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
