Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Newton v. Oden
as 3:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Sye Christopher Ras Newton
Defendant:
Georgette P. Oden doing business as G. Oden PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fleming et al v. SMITH
as 2:2021cv05446
Plaintiff:
Georgette Fleming and Tasheeba Fleming-Moore
Defendant:
CHAD SMITH and P/O CHAD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERTRAND et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BERTRAND and TYRONE R. BERTRAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MATYCHAK et al v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
GARY A. MATYCHAK and GEORGETTE MATYCHAK
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANTOR et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03730
Plaintiff:
HARMONY MANTOR , SARAH MARCHESE , MELISSA MARCHETTA and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC. , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONSTANTINOU et al v. CZAPRACKI et al
as 2:2016cv02649
Plaintiff:
STAVROS CONSTANTINOU and GEORGETTE CONSTANTINOU
Defendant:
BRIAN CZAPRACKI and TONY DEPAUL & SON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADY v. AIRGAS, INC.
as 2:2015cv04099
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE M. BRADY
Defendant:
AIRGAS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KERCHER et al v. KNOX et al
as 2:2015cv00472
Petitioner:
AMANDA KERCHER, LISA M. TULLIS, CHELSEY M. PENIX and others
Respondent:
MEREDITH KNOX, ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON and PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OLSKI v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv07288
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE OLSKI
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
