Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05581
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff: LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant: WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webber v. Fort et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff: Robert Webber
Defendant: Karl Fort, Georgia Department of Corrections, Georgia Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04289
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Young, MD et al v. Georgia Board of Regents et al
as 1:2018cv05324
Plaintiff: Linda Susan Young and Timothy Young, MD
Defendant: Billy Nichols, Georgia Board of Regents, Ted Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Georgia Board of Regents et al
as 6:2018cv00827
Plaintiff: Guenevere Perry
Defendant: Georgia Board of Regents and President M. Becker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derossi v. Georgia Board of Regents et al
as 1:2017cv03544
Defendant: Dean Carol Lefebvre and Georgia Board of Regents
Plaintiff: Scott Steven Derossi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03179
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15561
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Gibbons v. McBride et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00056
Plaintiff: Frederick Gibbons
Defendant: William McBride, Ernest Black, Jr., Eugene Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?