Cases 51 - 60 of 111
JACKSON v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2010cv01358
Petitioner:
HUBERT JACKSON
Respondent:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and GERALD L. ROZUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIEUDONNE v. SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00236
Plaintiff:
RONALD DIEUDONNE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM, SGT. STERIL, CO CROWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Volz v. Rozum, et al
as 10-3583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JOSEPH VOLZ, John Volz
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
LENHART v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00218
Petitioner:
RANDY ROSS LENHART
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET, PA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NIEVES-RAMOS v. ROZUM et al
as 1:2010cv01730
Petitioner:
Jose Nieves-ramos
Respondent:
Gerald L. Rozum, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and District Attorney of the County of Dauphin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SLOAN v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, HEIDI SROKA, DAWN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIEUDONNE v. SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
RONALD DIEUDONNE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GERALD L. ROZUM, SERGEANT STERIL, C.O. KORDISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIEVES-RAMOS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00167
Petitioner:
JOSE NIEVES-RAMOS
Respondent:
GERALD L. ROZUM, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lawrence Fisher v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 10-2764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DA ALLEGHENY and ATTY GEN PA
Daniel Wesley-EL v. Rozum, et al
as 10-2766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD L. ROZUM, Superintendent for S.C.I. Somerset, ATTY GEN PA, SUPERINTENDENT SCI SOMERSET and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
